Description
Enhancing Project Delivery with AI – A Practical Introduction and Workshop Objectives
Analyse text with Azure AI Language
Build a question answering solution
Build a conversational language understanding model
Create a custom text classification solution
Create a custom named entity extraction solution
Translate text with Azure AI Translator service
Create speech-enabled apps with Azure AI services
Translate speech with the Azure AI Speech service
Enhancing Project Delivery with AI: A Practical Introduction and Workshop Outline
Understand how AI is transforming project management practices
Identify key AI tools and technologies applicable to project delivery
Apply AI-driven techniques to improve planning, risk management, communication & stakeholder engagement, resource optimisation – e.g. learning how to craft simple prompts; different techniques of prompt approaches; and optimise output formatting; refinement of requests; detailed analysing of data etc.
Integrate AI solutions with existing project management tools and workflows
Evaluate the risks, and change management considerations when adopting AI
Learn to navigate the ethics and key challenges AI usage holds
Appreciate the drawbacks of utilising / non utilisation of AI as early adopters in the project environment
Enhancing Project Delivery with AI: A Practical Introduction and Workshop
We recommend that attendees of this course have the following prerequisites:
Participants should have project management experience
A basic knowledge of AI apps (will be useful)
Be signed up / access for usage of at least one of the following;ChatGPT,Google’s Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Microsoft’s CoPilot
Intended Audience
This course would be suitable for those who are new to the topic of AI, but have a working knowledge of project management and its principles
Attendees Comments
“The “hands-on” nature of the session was the highlight. Actually running the prompts in a project based scenario was far more effective than just reading slides”
“”The group discussion allowed brainstorming, debate, view of consensus and some points on the edges.”




